FIA Faces Legal Battle Over "Illusion of Democracy"

Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA) Logo

A lawsuit filed in Paris claims new rules make the 2025 presidential election an uncontestable race, threatening the organization's governance.

The leadership of the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA), the global governing body for motorsport and Formula 1, is facing a significant legal challenge that strikes at the heart of its democratic processes. An emergency lawsuit filed at the Paris High Court seeks to suspend the upcoming 2025 presidential election. The challenge, brought by presidential hopeful Laura Villars, alleges that recent rule changes have unfairly blocked all challengers, creating what one critic called an "illusion of democracy" and ensuring the incumbent stands unopposed.

This legal confrontation places the 28-year-old Swiss-French driver and entrepreneur against the powerful incumbent, Mohammed Ben Sulayem, who is seeking a second term. At stake is not just the December 12 election, but the very transparency and governance of the organization. Villars's lawsuit contends that the election rules, amended in June, violate the FIA’s own statutes and "principles of democracy and pluralism." A preliminary hearing for the emergency challenge is scheduled for November 10.

A 'Locked' Election: How the Rules Block Challengers

The core of the dispute is a complex and rigid nomination process. To run for president, a candidate must present a complete list of seven vice-presidents representing all six global FIA regions. Furthermore, these vice-presidents must be selected from a pre-approved pool of World Motor Sport Council (WMSC) nominees.

The critical flaw, according to the legal challenge, lies with the South American region. For this election, the only eligible candidate nominated for the South American vice-presidential role is Fabiana Ecclestone, the wife of former F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone.

Ecclestone has already declared her support for Ben Sulayem’s re-election team. Because the rules stipulate that a nominee cannot appear on two competing lists, this effectively makes it impossible for Villars or any other rival to build a complete, compliant ticket. The process, critics argue, stopped itself before it could ever begin.

Key Figures and Broader Criticism

The new system has already forced other potential candidates to withdraw. Tim Mayer, an American motorsports executive and former FIA steward, ended his own bid, publicly accusing the process of creating an "illusion of democracy."

Mayer subsequently commissioned a report from governance expert Dr. Arnout Geeraert to analyze the FIA’s structure. The report was scathing, describing the organization's governance as "power without brakes" and stating that the body "conducts elections but not contests."

The report concluded that while the individual rules might seem sensible, their collective application creates an incredibly narrow and rigid path for challengers, one that ultimately favors the incumbent. Mayer warned that this model trades organizational resilience for control, posing a "real and present existential threat" to the FIA.

"Acting to Protect the FIA"

Villars's lawyer, Robin Binsard, confirmed the emergency proceedings had been approved, noting that the case highlights “serious democratic shortcomings within the FIA.”

Villars herself has framed the lawsuit not as an attack, but as a protective measure. “I am not against the FIA—I am acting to protect it,” she stated, arguing that democracy is the organization's core strength. She claims she attempted to open a constructive dialogue with the FIA twice regarding the internal democracy and transparency of the electoral rules but received inadequate responses, necessitating the legal action.

The immediate future of the FIA's leadership now rests with the French court. Villars has requested the election, currently scheduled for December 12 in Uzbekistan, be suspended pending a final ruling. If the court grants the suspension or the dispute extends past that date, Ben Sulayem would likely remain in office under a temporary caretaker mandate. This status would prevent him from making significant decisions, leaving the powerful world of motorsport governance in a state of suspended animation until its internal democracy can be resolved.